Skip to content
CoolNewApps

Head to head

Squarespace vs Webflow

The same six questions asked of each one, side by side.

AttributeOur pickSquarespaceAlternativeWebflow
Starting price$25/mo$25/mo
Free tierLimitedYes
Ease of startScored 5/5Usable same dayScored 2/5Takes real setup
Fit for solo / small teamScored 4/5Good for a small teamScored 4/5Good for a small team
Switching costHighMedium
Best forBrochure sites, portfolios and small shops where design quality out of the box matters and you will not be selling digital products or memberships.Designers who want precise control over layout and interactions without writing the code, and who will use the CMS.
Worth knowing side by side
Transaction fee2%—
Renews higherNoNo
Worst forAnyone selling courses, memberships or downloads on the entry plan. Basic takes 7% of that revenue, Core still takes 5%, and only Advanced at $139/mo goes to zero.People who want a site up this afternoon. Webflow expects you to understand box models and positioning, and it is unforgiving if you do not.
Skip it ifYou need to customise beyond the template system. CSS and JavaScript access starts at Core, and even then you are working inside Squarespace's structure.You need a simple brochure site. Framer or Carrd will get you there in a fraction of the time for less money.
VisitVisit

Why Squarespace is marked as our pick

Polished templates with a 7% cut of memberships on the entry plan that nobody quotes. It has the lowest ongoing cost of the tools compared here. We compare on the price you keep paying, not the introductory rate — a plan advertised cheaply that renews higher is ranked on its renewal price. Read the methodology.

Other matchups